Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you have actually safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive information only on official, protected websites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct suppliers of housing, such as property owners and property companies as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and homeowners insurance coverage business whose prejudiced practices make housing unavailable to persons since of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department may file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a concern of basic public importance. Where force or hazard of force is used to deny or disrupt reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may institute criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise provides procedures for handling private problems of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of a prohibited housing practice, may submit a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based on referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
Among the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The bulk of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing service providers try to camouflage their discrimination by giving false info about schedule of housing, either stating that nothing was offered or steering homeseekers to certain areas based upon race. Individuals who receive such incorrect details or misdirection may have no understanding that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought lots of cases declaring this type of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to uncover this kind of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible liable. The majority of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have declared discrimination based upon race or color. A few of the Department's cases have actually also declared that municipalities and other local federal government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they rejected permits or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to primarily minority neighborhoods, because the potential locals were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a particular religious beliefs also less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to restrict using private homes as a places of worship. The number of cases submitted since 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in comparison to some of the other forbidden bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does consist of a restricted exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a religious company to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same faith.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are bad, and with restricted housing alternatives, frequently have little recourse but to tolerate the humiliation and deterioration of unwanted sexual advances or risk having their households and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on property managers who produce an untenable living environment by demanding sexual favors from tenants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we seek both to acquire relief for tenants who have been dealt with unjustly by a property owner because of sex and also prevent other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing effects. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning might also adversely affect women, particularly minority females. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of an individual's birth or where his or her forefathers stem. Census data suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action against municipal federal governments that have attempted to reduce or restrict the number of Hispanic households that may live in their communities. We have actually taken legal action against loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has likewise sued lending institutions for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it versus private property owners who have discriminated versus such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, forbids discrimination in housing against households with kids under 18. In addition to forbiding a straight-out rejection of housing to families with kids, the Act also avoids housing companies from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of kids. For example, landlords may not locate families with children in any single portion of a complex, put an unreasonable restriction on the overall variety of individuals who might reside in a house, or restrict their access to recreational services offered to other renters. In many circumstances, the amended Fair Housing Act restricts a housing provider from declining to rent or offer to families with kids. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which fulfills the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published policies and extra guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of impairment in all types of housing deals. The Act specifies persons with a disability to imply those individuals with psychological or physical impairments that considerably restrict several significant life activities. The term mental or physical disability might include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing disability, movement impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, persistent fatigue, learning special needs, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity may consist of seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, caring for one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also protects individuals who have a record of such an impairment, or are considered as having such an impairment. Current users of unlawful controlled substances, persons founded guilty for illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance, sex transgressors, and juvenile culprits are ruled out handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no defenses to individuals with or without disabilities who provide a direct threat to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct hazard should be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic assumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for persons with impairments has focused on two significant areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other policies worrying land use are not employed to prevent the property choices of these individuals, consisting of needlessly limiting common, or congregate, residential plans, such as group homes. The 2nd area is guaranteeing that freshly constructed multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is accessible to and usable by people with impairments, and, in specific, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus people with specials needs, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with specials needs might cohabit in congregate living plans, often described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other city government entities from making zoning or land usage decisions or executing land use policies that omit or otherwise discriminate versus individuals with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
- To use land usage policies or actions that treat groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance restricting housing for persons with impairments or a specific type of disability, such as psychological disease, from locating in a specific location, while enabling other groups of unassociated individuals to live together because area.
- To act versus, or reject an authorization, for a home because of the special needs of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building permit for a home due to the fact that it was planned to offer housing for persons with psychological retardation.
- To decline to clear up lodgings in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such accommodations might be necessary to pay for persons or groups of individuals with specials needs a level playing field to use and delight in housing. What makes up a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested modifications of guidelines or policies are sensible. If an asked for adjustment enforces an excessive monetary or administrative burden on a city government, or if an adjustment develops a fundamental alteration in a city government's land usage and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against persons with specials needs to consist of a failure "to design and build" specific brand-new multi-family residences so that they are accessible to and usable by persons with specials needs, and especially individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all recently constructed multi-family dwellings of four or more systems meant for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain functions: an accessible entrance on an available route, accessible common and public use areas, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each residence, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available location, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and functional kitchens and restrooms configured so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.
Developers, home builders, owners, and architects responsible for the design or construction of new multi-family housing might be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings stop working to meet these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have actually been fixed by approval decrees providing a variety of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other construction requirements) that will offer for making other housing units available; training on the ease of access requirements for those associated with the building procedure; a required that all brand-new housing jobs adhere to the availability requirements, and financial relief for those injured by the violations. In addition, the Department has sought to promote accessibility through structure codes.
